In
September, California became the first state to enact a “yes means yes”
law mandating that students ask their partners for “affirmative,
conscious and voluntary agreement to engage in sexual activity.” That
agreement, the law notes, is “ongoing throughout a sexual activity and
can be revoked at any time.”
In
response to this news, the Phi Delta Theta chapter at Texas Tech University displayed
a banner that said “No Means Yes, Yes Means Anal” for which they were
suspended, according to the Wall Street Journal. That’s right… that was actually
printed in the Journal. That is not something I expect to read while having a
light breakfast in the morning. They obviously realized it was the only thing
in that story actually worth reading.
And this law raises some other questions. What if right as you were about to ‘finish’ she revokes? Pull out? Could she legally defeat you in court? That could be a dirty court hearing. A real sticky situation. Couldn't you claim that you thought she was saying "know"?
This law sounds like a way to turn potential rapists into likely murderers. Don’t the people who wrote this law know that once the train gets going, it can't just be stopped on a whim?
If No really meant No, there would be no such thing as safe words. Case closed. That law is unconstitutional.
That agreement, the law notes, is “ongoing throughout a sexual activity and can be revoked at any time.”While that seems absurd, if it gets revoked in the middle of the act, you're obviously doing it wrong.
And this law raises some other questions. What if right as you were about to ‘finish’ she revokes? Pull out? Could she legally defeat you in court? That could be a dirty court hearing. A real sticky situation. Couldn't you claim that you thought she was saying "know"?
This law sounds like a way to turn potential rapists into likely murderers. Don’t the people who wrote this law know that once the train gets going, it can't just be stopped on a whim?
If No really meant No, there would be no such thing as safe words. Case closed. That law is unconstitutional.